Public employee groups have grown accustomed to governmental agencies ignoring their bargaining agreements and, from time to time, doing as the agency pleases. However, such actions are not only a violation of trust by the agency, they often consititute a breach of contract or an unfair labor practice.
Faced with the reality that the actions of the Sheriff were an unfair labor practice, the Lincoln County Commissioners rethought the plan:
Wages scaled back
By Mark Young , The North Platte Telegraph
01/15/2008
“It’s quite a slap in the face from this board,†said Lt. Dave Williams, jail administrator for the Lincoln County Sheriff’s Department, referring to his wage being scaled back after union representatives from the Fraternal Order of Police filed a complaint against the county.
According to Roland Kramer, state trustee for FOP, complaints were lodged for the way Lincoln County negotiated Williams’ contract when FOP is responsible for negotiating all salary wages for every officer, with the exception of sheriff and chief deputy. All other department officers fall under the FOP negotiated contract.
Attorneys for FOP argued that Williams’ contract with Lincoln County was not negotiated by FOP and that he was hired out of classification. Williams was hired under a Step 3 pay scale, but under a road patrol scale, not corrections.
FOP legal council has labeled it an unfair labor practice and has demanded that Williams’ current salary be rescinded.
“FOP has now been told that (the county) is willing to negotiate, but has refused to rescind its actions,†said legal council for FOP Lodge 26, in a written letter to the Lincoln County Board of Commissioners.
The letter further accused the county of continuing to perpetrate this action and while litigation was not wished, it would become necessary to file litigation against the county if it did not rescind Williams’ salary. Last week, Lincoln County Sheriff Jerome Kramer credited Williams with saving the county up to $15,000 a month in medical expenses alone with his administrative efforts.
Williams expressed disappointment with the commissioners’ actions despite it appearing to be a case of hands tied on the part of the commissioners.
“It’s my opinion we are hamstrung unless we are willing to go to litigation and personally I think it’s litigation that we can’t win,†said Commissioner Joe Hewgley.
Williams was nonetheless disappointed not only for the action, but indicated that the proposed negotiations that were expected to take place this week to resolve the issue apparently never took place.
“It was my understanding at last week’s meeting that the union and the board were going to negotiate this matter,†said Williams. “I’m disappointed and it was my hopes that this board would be behind that.â€
Hewgley said he, too, was disappointed, but that it appeared the board had no legal recourse. Williams, however, feels as though he may have some and informed the board that he would be contacting his own attorney and, “will proceed from there.â€
Ultimately, the commissioners were able to hire Williams under a Step 4 pay scale for a correctional lieutenant, but Williams said it was still a drastic pay cut that he could not afford to take.
Roland Kramer was asked by County Chairman Duane Deterding if what happened here was going to be satisfactory to the FOP union.
“I’m not sure where you are going with that, but what happened clearly fits the demands,†he said. “All I can do is report back to the executive board and let them know what happened here today.â€
The decision by the commissioners apparently eliminated any need for further negotiation on behalf of an individual, but the issue can be brought back up when the county negotiates the FOP contract in September. Legal counsel for FOP indicated in its letter that any new negotiations on behalf of Williams would require new negotiations for all employees, not just one.
Visibly upset, Hewgley assured Williams, “You are not the only one disappointed. . . .â€
