<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Your Nebraska Lawyers &#187; Product Liability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.keatinglaw.com/category/product-liability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Keating, O&#8217;Gara Attorney Gary Young Fights for Safety of Public Employees</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2011/05/keating-ogara-attorney-gary-young-fights-for-safety-of-public-employees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2011/05/keating-ogara-attorney-gary-young-fights-for-safety-of-public-employees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Defect Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Recall Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keatinglaw.com/?p=1349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Lincoln Journal Star:

Police: Allegations in city mower death inconclusive 
By Peter Salter, Lincoln Journal Star, May 6, 2011
The months-long police investigation into last year&#8217;s lawn mower death of a city worker is done, delivered &#8212; and largely inconclusive.  And it will likely do nothing to quell complaints that the city&#8217;s street maintenance department fosters fear, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://journalstar.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/article_ecea82e9-e8fb-5a0d-8f3d-d1a2775ecf90.html">Lincoln Journal Star</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><img class="alignright" title="Heckendorn Mower" src="http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/journalstar.com/content/tncms/assets/editorial/6/1f/6ba/61f6ba7c-8289-5e6a-a5d3-e227484bea56-revisions/4dc33b9441ce2.image.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="371" /></strong></p>
<p><strong>Police: Allegations in city mower death inconclusive </strong></p>
<p><strong></strong>By Peter Salter, Lincoln Journal Star, May 6, 2011</p>
<p>The months-long police investigation into last year&#8217;s lawn mower death of a city worker is done, delivered &#8212; and largely inconclusive.  And it will likely do nothing to quell complaints that the city&#8217;s street maintenance department fosters fear, intimidation and unsafe practices.</p>
<p>&#8220;When an investigation about whether they protected employees from safety hazards comes back inconclusive, it doesn&#8217;t speak well about the management of the organization,&#8221; said <a href="http://www.keatinglaw.com/attorney-profiles/gary-l-young/">Gary Young, attorney</a> for the union representing the city&#8217;s blue-collar workers.</p>
<p>Young called the street maintenance department &#8220;the worst-managed division of any public employer&#8221; of the unions he represents.  &#8221;The accident that happened, if it&#8217;s going to happen, this is where it&#8217;s going to take place.&#8221;</p>
<p>On Aug. 16, Eric Kohles was found crushed by a 1,200-pound riding mower at the bottom of a grassy ditch.  The 37-year-old worked for the city&#8217;s storm water division but had been helping mow that day &#8212; first near 56th and Sumner streets, and, after lunch, near 56th and Seward in northeast Lincoln.<br />
The husband and father died four days later.</p>
<p><span id="more-1349"></span>The next week, nearly a dozen street maintenance employees filed a grievance against their supervisors, alleging Kohles was told to mow an unsafe area with an unsafe mower he&#8217;d never used before.  They also said they&#8217;d warned supervisors about the mower and they&#8217;d been punished and humiliated for raising concerns.</p>
<p>They sought a third-party investigation of the accident and in early November &#8212; after the Public Works Department&#8217;s own probe proved inconclusive &#8212; the mayor asked the police to look into the complaints.<br />
An internal affairs detective spent about 80 hours on the assignment, focusing only on complaints in the grievance. He interviewed 18 workers and managers, pored over records, checked aerial photos and weather data.</p>
<p>&#8220;All we could conclude was that no supervisor told Eric to mow that ditch with that mower, and that he had never received training on that mower,&#8221; Police Chief Tom Casady said.  The investigation found no evidence to conclude Kohles was told to mow with the Heckendorn. He was told to drive the pickup pulling the mower, and he beat his foreman to the site, Casady said.  &#8220;It looks to me that Eric wasn&#8217;t the kind of guy who would stand around waiting for his foreman. He unpacked his equipment and went to work,&#8221; Casady said.</p>
<p>An experienced supervisor would have likely prevented the riding mower from mowing the steep slope of the ditch.  There&#8217;s little flat ground at the site, so it&#8217;s not clear why Kohles was sent there hauling the Heckendorn, Young said.  &#8221;Why was it sent there? Because the management of that department failed to protect against it being sent there. And the person they assigned to use it was inexperienced and didn&#8217;t know better. Why they sent it there, I don&#8217;t know.&#8221;</p>
<p>The police also couldn&#8217;t prove employees warned street maintenance director Scott Opfer about the mower in 2008 &#8212; or that employees were punished for raising safety concerns.  The workers said they raised concerns about two mowers; Opfer told the investigator he was told about a Toro boom mower and had it checked out, but couldn&#8217;t recall warnings about the Heckendorn, Casady said.</p>
<p>Union members also told investigators two workers were forced to cut the shop yard&#8217;s grass with push mowers under a hot sun in September 2008. Casady said his department compared mower records with weather data &#8212; and found no evidence of the allegation.  And Casady made it clear: Just because his department couldn&#8217;t prove an allegation, it wasn&#8217;t ruling it out, either. It&#8217;s simply inconclusive.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not good enough for Young, the union lawyer.  The standard of proof they required decided the matter before it started,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Multiple employees gave accounts substantiating the grievance, Young said. For example, employees witnessed and reported the alleged push-mower punishment.  The police department should have considered a preponderance of evidence, but the chief set the bar too high.  &#8221;When employees testify and that&#8217;s not enough, then you can&#8217;t prove anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>Casady said his department used the same standard as in all internal affairs investigations: An allegation must be conclusively proven to be sustained.  &#8221;In my book, 51 percent doesn&#8217;t cut it when people&#8217;s jobs or careers could be on the line, whether it is a laborer, a manager or anything in between.&#8221;</p>
<p>With the investigation done, the Public Works Department now must decide whether to grant the grievance &#8212; and remove several supervisors from managing employees, as requested by the union &#8212; or reject it. Public Works Director Greg MacLean could not be reached for comment Thursday.  Then the union will decide its next step, which includes appealing a rejection to the city personnel board.</p>
<p>Casady did recommend the Public Works Department&#8217;s safety committee review the department&#8217;s training requirements, which he called &#8220;a bit iffy.&#8221;  Some equipment &#8212; graders and snowplows, for instance &#8212; require training. But it&#8217;s not as formal for smaller pieces, like riding mowers.  Public works should determine the equipment and tools that require training and then keep records of trained employees, the chief said.</p>
<p>&#8220;At the police department, you don&#8217;t get a rifle, a pistol, a Taser or a nightstick until you get trained.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to a defective product, call the Keating O&#8217;Gara Law Firm at 888/234-5621.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2011/05/keating-ogara-attorney-gary-young-fights-for-safety-of-public-employees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury Awards Damages of $2.46 Million Against Supplier of Defective Chinese Drywall</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/06/jury-awards-damages-of-2-46-million-against-supplier-of-defective-chinese-drywall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/06/jury-awards-damages-of-2-46-million-against-supplier-of-defective-chinese-drywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Defect Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keatinglaw.com/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first jury to consider a defective Chinese drywall claim has come down hard on the supplier.  A Florida jury awarded 2.46 million to a Miami couple who claimed their house was ruined by gas emitted from the defective product.
Fla. Jury Finds Domestic Distributor of Chinese Drywall Negligent
Jose Pagliery
06-21-2010
A Florida jury on Friday awarded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first jury to consider a defective Chinese drywall claim <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202462857509&#038;Fla_Jury_Finds_Domestic_Distributor_of_Chinese_Drywall_Negligent">has come down hard </a>on the supplier.  A Florida jury awarded 2.46 million to a Miami couple who claimed their house was ruined by gas emitted from the defective product.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Fla. Jury Finds Domestic Distributor of Chinese Drywall Negligent</strong><br />
Jose Pagliery<br />
06-21-2010<a href="http://www.keatinglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/chinese-drywall.jpg"><img src="http://www.keatinglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/chinese-drywall-300x181.jpg" alt="" title="chinese-drywall" width="300" height="181" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1036" /></a></p>
<p>A Florida jury on Friday awarded $2.46 million to a Miami couple who claimed their house was ruined by gas emitted by imported Chinese drywall in the nation&#8217;s first trial against a domestic distributor.</p>
<p>Jurors concluded that Miami-based Banner Supply knowingly sold defective wallboard that was installed in the Coconut Grove, Fla., home of Chevron attorney Armin Seifart and Lisa Gore, who asked for $4.4 million in damages for repairs and the inconvenience of temporarily losing access to their $1.66 million home.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a strong victory in favor of consumers,&#8221; said family attorney Ervin Gonzalez of Colson Hicks Eidson in Coral Gables, Fla. &#8220;The American public won&#8217;t tolerate companies that cheat.&#8221;</p>
<p>Jurors decided Banner was negligent, knowingly sold defective wallboard and violated Florida&#8217;s deceptive and unfair trade law, and that its product will reduce the home&#8217;s resale value.</p>
<p>The couple&#8217;s lawsuit is similar to thousands nationwide by homeowners with Chinese drywall installed in their homes. Homeowners complain noxious gases released by the wallboard leave homes smelling like rotten eggs and corrode metal pipes and electronics . . . </p></blockquote>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to a defective product, talk to one of the experienced Nebraska defective product lawyers at the Keating, O&#8217;Gara Law Firm at 888/234-0621.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/06/jury-awards-damages-of-2-46-million-against-supplier-of-defective-chinese-drywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defective Toyota Accelerator May Have Led to Wrongful Death</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/02/defective-toyota-accelerator-may-have-led-to-wrongful-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/02/defective-toyota-accelerator-may-have-led-to-wrongful-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Accident Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Crash Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Defect Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keatinglaw.com/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Houston Chronicle:
Fatal Houston crash leads to lawsuit against Toyota
By Mary Flood
Feb. 1, 2010, 10:40PM

The family of a Houston woman whose car sped through a stop sign and smashed into a cement wall, killing her on impact a week before Christmas, filed what is likely the third acceleration-related wrongful death lawsuit against Toyota in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/hotstories/6846395.html">The Houston Chronicle</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Fatal Houston crash leads to lawsuit against Toyota</strong><br />
By Mary Flood<br />
Feb. 1, 2010, 10:40PM<br />
<a href="http://www.keatinglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Michael-Harris-Toyota-Death-Case.jpg"><img src="http://www.keatinglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Michael-Harris-Toyota-Death-Case.jpg" alt="" title="Michael Harris Toyota Death Case" width="260" height="173" class="alignright size-full wp-image-927" /></a><br />
The family of a Houston woman whose car sped through a stop sign and smashed into a cement wall, killing her on impact a week before Christmas, filed what is likely the third acceleration-related wrongful death lawsuit against Toyota in the nation Monday.</p>
<p>Trina Renee Harris, a 34-year-old mother of two, died on impact when her 2009 Toyota Corolla slammed into an East Hardy Toll Road cement divider at Barry, leaving no skid marks, Houston police reported.</p>
<p>Her husband, Michael Harris, filed a lawsuit Monday against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., gas pedal maker CTS Corp. and Fred Haas Toyota World, which leased her the car. Lawyers involved in the lawsuit said it&#8217;s likely the third such case filed in response to acceleration problems that prompted Toyota to recall millions of vehicles and halt some production.</p>
<p>“I want those who were negligent to be held responsible. This problem was there before Dec. 18 when she died,” Michael Harris said. The U.S. Navy petty officer first class had recently completed a stint on an aircraft carrier in the Middle East and was in San Diego when he learned of his wife&#8217;s death. He returned to Houston, where the family opened Christmas gifts Trina Harris had bought . . . .</p></blockquote>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured in Nebraska due to a defective Toyota accelerator pedal, call the Keating, O’Gara Law Firm at 888/234-0621 for a free consultation.</p>
<p><strong>For helpful advice on what to do if the accelerator sticks, watch the following video:</strong></p>
<p><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/716758716" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=63913967001&#038;playerId=716758716&#038;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&#038;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&#038;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&#038;domain=embed&#038;autoStart=false&#038;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" class="aligncenter" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/02/defective-toyota-accelerator-may-have-led-to-wrongful-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to Provide Three Point Restraint for Rear Seat Passenger Leads to Verdict Against Ford Motor Co.</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/01/failure-to-provide-three-point-restraint-for-rear-seat-passenger-leads-to-verdict-against-ford-motor-co/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/01/failure-to-provide-three-point-restraint-for-rear-seat-passenger-leads-to-verdict-against-ford-motor-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Accident Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Crash Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Defect Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinal Cord Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.keatinglaw.com/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Law.com
Already on the hook for the lion&#8217;s share of a $17.7 million judgment and waiting for a decision from a jury that was out considering punitive damages, Ford Motor Co. decided to settle with a couple who sued following a Christmas 2005 wreck that left the woman paralyzed.
The agreement came after a Clayton County, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202437315789">Law.com</a><img src="http://www.keatinglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Ford-Logo.jpg" alt="Ford Logo" title="Ford Logo" width="150" height="113" class="alignright size-full wp-image-923" /></p>
<blockquote><p>Already on the hook for the lion&#8217;s share of a $17.7 million judgment and waiting for a decision from a jury that was out considering punitive damages, Ford Motor Co. decided to settle with a couple who sued following a Christmas 2005 wreck that left the woman paralyzed.</p>
<p>The agreement came after a Clayton County, Ga., jury ordered Ford on Dec. 18 to pay more than $16 million of the judgment to compensate for what the plaintiffs argued were design defects in the 2002 Explorer sport utility vehicle in which the woman was a passenger.</p>
<p>Lynn Wheeler, then 58, was seated in the back seat between her two grandchildren, who were in booster seats, as her son drove to church that morning along Noah&#8217;s Ark Road in Clayton County . . . Wheeler, who was restrained only by a lap belt, slammed forward and down as the rear seat latch failed, and it collapsed on her.</p>
<p>&#8220;As a result,&#8221; says the pre-trial order, &#8220;Lynn Wheeler&#8217;s head and neck were driven down and forward into the front seat and/or center console, catastrophically injuring her spinal cord.&#8221;</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>The complaint asserted that the automaker&#8217;s design for both the rear seat latch and decision to install a lap belt rather than a three-point shoulder belt constituted negligence, and it also said Ford should have warned the Wheelers and the general public &#8220;of the dangers in a reasonably foreseeable collision presented by the design of the Ford Explorer rear seat, occupant restraint system and surrounding structures.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to a product defect such as a poorly designed restraint system, please call the Keating, O&#8217;Gara Law Firm at 888/234-0621 for a free consultation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2010/01/failure-to-provide-three-point-restraint-for-rear-seat-passenger-leads-to-verdict-against-ford-motor-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Merck Loses Bid to Undo $13.5 Million Vioxx Verdict</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/08/merck-loses-bid-to-undo-135-million-vioxx-verdict/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/08/merck-loses-bid-to-undo-135-million-vioxx-verdict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nebraskainjurylawreport.com/2007/08/15/merck-loses-bid-to-undo-135-million-vioxx-verdict/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg news reports:
A New Jersey judge upheld a $13.5 million verdict against drugmaker Merck &#38; Co., won by a couple who sued over injuries the man sustained after he took the company&#8217;s Vioxx painkiller.
The Aug. 7 ruling by Atlantic County Superior Court Judge Carol Higbee denied Merck&#8217;s request for a new trial or a reduction [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&#038;sid=aYY.ATVpiNgA">Bloomberg news reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A New Jersey judge upheld a $13.5 million verdict against drugmaker Merck &amp; Co., won by a couple who sued over injuries the man sustained after he took the company&#8217;s Vioxx painkiller.</p>
<p>The Aug. 7 ruling by Atlantic County Superior Court Judge Carol Higbee denied Merck&#8217;s request for a new trial or a reduction in the damages, which included the jury&#8217;s punitive award of $9 million. Higbee also awarded the couple $2 million in attorney fees and costs plus $2,552 per day in interest.</p>
<p align="center">* * *</p>
<p>John and Irma McDarby sued Whitehouse Station, New Jersey- based Merck in 2005 after John McDarby, who used Vioxx for four years, suffered a heart attack. Their suit is one of more than 10,000 filed against the company.</p>
<p>Merck withdrew Vioxx from the market in 2004 after a study showed it doubled the risk of a heart attack in patients after 18 months of use.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to a dangerous product, please call Keating, Oâ€™Gara, Nedved &amp; Peter at 888/234-0621 or fill out the contact form on this site. Your first consultation is free and we handle cases on a contingency fee basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/08/merck-loses-bid-to-undo-135-million-vioxx-verdict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Tires Recalled</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/07/chinese-tires-recalled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/07/chinese-tires-recalled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Crash Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska Recall Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Defect Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Recall Lawyer Lincoln Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nebraskainjurylawreport.com/2007/07/10/chinese-tires-recalled/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On product recalls, it&#8217;s &#8220;All China All the Time&#8221; these days.
BAKERSFIELD &#8211; A New Jersey importer of Chinese-made tires is asking the federal government for help in recalling almost half a million defective tires that may have already contributed to one death. 
The tire recall follows other major recalls of Chinese-made products, including pet food, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On product recalls, it&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.kget.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=131a3e4e-94f2-46b5-acdf-f9074e98ed0a">All China All the Time</a>&#8221; these days.</p>
<blockquote><p>BAKERSFIELD &#8211; A New Jersey importer of Chinese-made tires is asking the federal government for help in recalling almost half a million defective tires that may have already contributed to one death. <a href="http://www.keatinglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/chintires.jpg" title="chintires.jpg"><img src="http://www.keatinglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/chintires-150x150.jpg" alt="chintires.jpg" class="float-right" /></a></p>
<p>The tire recall follows other major recalls of Chinese-made products, including pet food, toothpaste, and toy trains, prompting widespread consumer concerns.</p>
<p>Now consumer groups wonder if Chinese-made products are safe, given the recalls made in recent months.</p>
<p>The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration said a New Jersey companyâ€”Foreign Tire Salesâ€”has announced a recall of at least 450,000 tires made in China, although who is going to pay for the recall and tire replacements remains in question.</p>
<p><strong>The defective tires, used on light trucks and SUVâ€™s, have been sold under the names of Westlake, Telluride, Compass and YKS. </strong></p>
<p>Lawyers are blaming the tires for a fatal accident last year near Philadelphia.</p>
<p>&#8220;Check your tires,â€ said Jeffery Killino, a lawyer for accident victims. â€œMake sure that you&#8217;re not riding on these tires!&#8221;</p>
<p>This tire recall follows several other recent recalls of Chinese-made products, including toothpaste containing a poisonous chemical, contaminated pet food, and Thomas the Train Engine toys decorated with lead paint.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to the negligence of another, please call Keating, O&#8217;Gara, Nedved &#038; Peter at 888/234-0621 or fill out the contact form on this site. Your first consultation is free and we handle cases on a contingency fee basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/07/chinese-tires-recalled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning:  Ben Gay Can Kill You</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/warning-ben-gay-can-kill-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/warning-ben-gay-can-kill-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medication Errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nebraskainjurylawreport.com/2007/06/25/warning-ben-gay-can-kill-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Denver Post reports on this nearly unbelievable story of a death caused by a sports cream:
A medical examiner blamed a 17-year-old track star&#8217;s death on the use of too much anti- inflammatory muscle cream, the kind used to soothe aching legs after exercise.
Arielle Newman, a cross-country runner at Notre Dame Academy on Staten Island, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://test.denverpost.com/headlines/ci_6104194">Denver Post reports </a>on this nearly unbelievable story of a death caused by a sports cream:<br />
<strong>A medical examiner blamed a 17-year-old track star&#8217;s death on the use of too much anti- inflammatory muscle cream, the kind used to soothe aching legs after exercise.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Arielle Newman, a cross-country runner at Notre Dame Academy on Staten Island, died after her body absorbed high levels of methyl salicylate, an anti-inflammatory found in sports creams such as Bengay and Icy Hot, the New York City medical examiner said Friday.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The medical examiner&#8217;s spokeswoman, Ellen Borakove, said the teen used &#8220;topical medication to excess.&#8221; She said it was the first time that her office had reported a death from using a sports cream.</strong></p>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to the negligence of another, please call Keating, O&#8217;Gara, Nedved &#038; Peter at 888/234-0621 or fill out the contact form on this site. Your first consultation is free and we handle cases on a contingency fee basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/warning-ben-gay-can-kill-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury Finds Fentanyl Patch Caused Death</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/did-fentanyl-patch-cause-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/did-fentanyl-patch-cause-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medication Errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nebraskainjurylawreport.com/2007/06/25/did-fentanyl-patch-cause-death/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The New York Times:
A federal jury on Tuesday awarded $5.5 million to the father of a man who died while wearing a drug patch made by two Johnson &#38; Johnson subsidiaries.
The jury in Federal District Court in West Palm Beach found that Janssen Pharmaceutica Products and the Alza Corporation, both based in New Jersey, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/business/20drug.html">The New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A federal jury on Tuesday <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/business/20drug.html">awarded $5.5 million </a>to the father of a man who died while wearing a drug patch made by two Johnson &amp; Johnson subsidiaries.</p>
<p>The jury in Federal District Court in West Palm Beach found that Janssen Pharmaceutica Products and the Alza Corporation, both based in New Jersey, were liable in the death of Adam Hendelson, 28, who died in 2003 while wearing the companiesâ€™ Duragesic patch.</p>
<p>The patch delivers controlled doses of the powerful painkiller fentanyl.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to medical negligence, please call Keating, O&#8217;Gara, Nedved &#038; Peter at 888/234-0621 or fill out the contact form on this site. Your first consultation is free and we handle cases on a contingency fee basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/did-fentanyl-patch-cause-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Nothing Safe?</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/is-nothing-sacred/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/is-nothing-sacred/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nebraskainjurylawreport.com/2007/06/18/is-nothing-sacred/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Even Thomas the Tank Engine&#8217;s buddy James is having his problems.
The New York Times reports: &#8220;The toy maker RC2 Corporation pulled a number of its Thomas &#38; Friends trains and accessory parts off the shelves yesterday after learning that the red and yellow paint used to decorate more than 1.5 million of the toys contained [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.keatinglaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/james-engine.jpg" alt="james-engine.jpg" class="float-left" /><br />
Even Thomas the Tank Engine&#8217;s buddy James <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/15/business/15recall.html?_r=2&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=business&amp;adxnnlx=1181916074-fEDdiDkW2KJYe+NBpgxxGw&amp;oref=slogin">is having his problems</a>.</p>
<p>The New York Times reports: &#8220;The toy maker RC2 Corporation pulled a number of its Thomas &amp; Friends trains and accessory parts off the shelves yesterday after learning that the red and yellow paint used to decorate more than 1.5 million of the toys contained lead. <strong>The James Engine is . . . being recalled because the red and yellow paint used to decorate them contains lead.</strong> Lead, if ingested by children, can cause long-term neurological problems that affect learning and behavior.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to a defective product, please call Keating, O&#8217;Gara, Nedved &#038; Peter at 888/234-0621 or fill out the contact form on this site. Your first consultation is free and we handle cases on a contingency fee basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/is-nothing-sacred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1st Accutane Verdict:  $2.62 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/accutane-verdict-262-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/accutane-verdict-262-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Downing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nebraskainjurylawreport.com/2007/06/08/accutane-verdict-262-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law.com reports:
In the first of 400 suits to be tried over the acne drug Accutane&#8217;s propensity to cause inflammatory bowel disease, an Atlantic County, N.J., jury has assessed $2.62 million in damages against Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. and its Swiss parent company. However, the jury of six women and four men did not award punitive damages [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1181120733140">Law.com reports</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the first of 400 suits to be tried over the acne drug Accutane&#8217;s propensity to cause inflammatory bowel disease, an Atlantic County, N.J., jury has assessed $2.62 million in damages against Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. and its Swiss parent company. However, the jury of six women and four men did not award punitive damages under New Jersey&#8217;s Consumer Fraud Act because they found insufficient evidence the manufacturer intentionally failed to warn the drug can cause IBD.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1181120733140">here</a>.</p>
<p>If you or a loved one have been injured due to a dangerous product, please call Keating, O&#8217;Gara, Nedved &#038; Peter at 888/234-0621 or fill out the contact form on this site. Your first consultation is free and we handle cases on a contingency fee basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.keatinglaw.com/2007/06/accutane-verdict-262-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

